Pepsi’s Attempt at Social Activism: A Sip Too Far?

Disney In 2017, Pepsi launched an ad starring Kendall Jenner that aimed to merge the universal appeal of soft drinks with a message of social unity. The ad portrayed Jenner joining a protest and offering a can of Pepsi to a stoic police officer, symbolizing resolution and harmony.

However, what was intended as a unifying message quickly turned into a public relations crisis. Critics accused the ad of trivializing social justice movements, sparking widespread backlash and forcing Pepsi to withdraw the campaign. In this article, we examine how missteps in tone and execution derailed Pepsi’s well-meaning effort and why independent verification is crucial for avoiding similar pitfalls.

The Campaign: Bridging Gaps with a Can of Soda

Pepsi’s ad featured vibrant scenes of diverse protestors marching for vague causes like "peace" and "love." Jenner, a fashion model, abandons her photoshoot to join the demonstration, eventually handing a Pepsi to a police officer. The moment is framed as a gesture of solidarity, suggesting that Pepsi could ease tensions and unite people.

While the imagery was visually striking, the lack of specificity in the ad’s message diluted its impact. Instead of sparking inspiration, it came across as tone-deaf and commercializing deeply personal struggles.

The Backlash: A Recipe for Controversy

The ad faced immediate and intense criticism:

  • Cultural Insensitivity: Activists argued that the ad trivialized the gravity of social justice movements like Black Lives Matter.

  • Celebrity Misstep: Critics questioned Jenner’s role, highlighting the disconnect between her privileged background and the struggles depicted.

  • Social Media Outcry: Platforms like Twitter erupted with memes and critiques, branding the ad as an example of corporate opportunism.

In less than 48 hours, Pepsi pulled the ad and issued an apology, admitting they had “missed the mark.”

Impact on Brand Sentiment and Reputation

The campaign’s fallout extended beyond public relations:

  • Reputation Damage: Pepsi’s attempt at social commentary was widely ridiculed, impacting trust among socially conscious consumers.

  • Loss of Credibility: The backlash highlighted the risks of brands appearing inauthentic when addressing sensitive topics.

  • Financial Implications: Although the financial hit was less direct, Pepsi faced increased scrutiny and criticism in the months following the ad.

The Debate: Can Brands Champion Social Causes?

The Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad ignited an ongoing debate about the role of brands in social activism. While consumers expect companies to stand for more than just profits, authenticity and nuance are critical. Pepsi’s ad serves as a cautionary tale, showing that a poorly executed campaign can alienate audiences rather than inspire them.

How We Help Brands Avoid Similar Missteps

Our independent verification process ensures campaigns align with audience values and cultural sensitivities, reducing the risk of backlash. Through unbiased research and data-driven insights, we help brands craft messages that resonate authentically.

Conclusion: A Reminder to Listen First

Pepsi’s Kendall Jenner campaign illustrates the importance of understanding your audience and the cultural moment. Bold campaigns require thoughtful execution to avoid missteps that can undermine a brand’s credibility.

Next
Next

Gillette’s Bold Leap: A Shave Too Close?